Camden New Journal
Publications by New Journal Enterprises
spacer
  Home Archive Competition Jobs Tickets Accommodation Dating Contact us
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Your Letters
 
We need right to appeal bad planning decisions

• JOHN Kleeman (Something rotten at the heart of planning, Jan 26) was right to point out the deficiency in Camden planning and suggest that third party appeals seem to be the only way forward. He also suggests we use our vote to fight bad decision making.

I would invite him, therefore to name and shame the six Labour councillors who voted, sheep-like, for a large private house on the Vale of Health encroaching on Metropolitan Open Land.
This, against massive local opposition. Shame on them.
Unless we can trust our councillors to protect the best interest of the residents, without fear of suspicious deals being made with private developers behind our backs, our shaky belief in the planning system will evaporate totally.
With the Dalby Street application and the Vale of Health recent decisions one can only wonder what was going through the mind of the planners and our councillors when residents needed to be listened to.
It’s the residents who have to live with the consequences forever when such an ill-informed, incompetent decision is taken. A blow against the environment in the Vale of Health has a ripple effect that harms us all, as once again we observe and perverse planning decision.
If you, councillors, do not know how to judge a project effectively, please do us a favour and abstain. After all, applicants always have a right of appeal to the Minister when planning applications are not determined in due time.
These appeals are conducted by competent, independent planning inspectors who can judge an application on its merits and according to the law. They report directly to the Minister.
Winston Spencer
Castle Road, NW1


• Camden planning is so ramshackle these days. They probably think they can get away with anything. I am delighted therefore to read in your January 26 issue that the Heath and Hampstead society, the Vale of Health Society and Hampstead conservation area advisory committee are to join force to challenge in court the decision by the planners to grant permission to build a massive home in the Vale of the Health.
The latter will encroach the Metropolitan Open Land.
This will undoubtedly be an important decision, which will affect all of us for ever after. In the meantime, however, what happens to an impoverished area like Kentish Town?
An injudicious decision has obviously been made on what Councillor Gerry Harrison called an “extremely suspect” application at the Dalby site. This is a seven-storey, 55 flat scheme which will encroach on public land and the Talacre open space.
People there do not have the means to go to open court to get justice. The public is cheated by a local government and planning department who simply do not seem to give a damn about the interest of Camden residents.
Isn’t it time that third party appeals be introduced in this country so that mistakes in law could be rectified with a minimum account of fuss and expense (this application usually costs only a few hundred pounds elsewhere.)
For those not familiar with this system, disgruntled residents can have any planning decision reconsidered by an independent inspector. Such a fair and democratic system is not however, likely to happen under Labour.
Residents suffer the consequences of bad planning decisions for ever after.
Mildred Thomas
Denning Road, NW3
spacer
» A-Z of Theatre
» Local Reviews
» Local Listings
» West End Reviews
» West End Listings
» Theatre Tickets
» Theatre & Hotel Packages













spacer


Theatre Music
Arts & Events Attractions
spacer
 
 


  up