Camden News
Publications by New Journal Enterprises
spacer
  Home Archive Competition Jobs Tickets Accommodation Dating Contact us
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Camden New Journal - LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Published: 14 May 2009
 
The cost of a dirty canal

• ONE of the pleasures of the Regent’s Canal in the spring is seeing ducklings and goslings.
The tiny creatures often fall prey to larger fish or larger birds, perhaps even rats, so the natural struggle is evident enough.
How they cope with plastic bags and other litter and rubbish thrown down by humans, I don’t know.
Should we not act more responsibly by dealing with the litter problem of the canal?
Disposing of litter properly in the first place would be a good start.
As the litter lout is a common animal in Camden Town, British Waterways should make it clear that there is a cost for clearing the canal of litter and rubbish, so as to safeguard wildlife.
City Hall should be charged by British Waterways for the cost of clearing the canal, the cost being passed on to all council taxpayers.
London’s wildlife deserves better than the current rubbish state of affairs and we owe it to the world that London’s canals are cleaned up for London 2012.
What a pity seagulls and pigeons don’t target only litter louts!
Lester May
Reachview Close, NW1



Send your letters to: The Letters Editor, Camden New Journal, 40 Camden Road, London, NW1 9DR or email to letters@thecnj.co.uk. The deadline for letters is midday Tuesday. The editor regrets that anonymous letters cannot be published, although names and addresses can be withheld. Please include a full name, postal address and telephone number. Letters may be edited for reasons of space.

Comment on this article.
(You must supply your full name and email address for your comment to be published)

Name:

Email:

Comment:


 

 
 
spacer














spacer


Theatre Music
Arts & Events Attractions
spacer
 
 


  up